Saturday, August 4, 2018

Harlan Ellison: 1934 - 2018

The morbid truth is I started this piece many times in the past several years. I dug deep, burning battery life staring at an empty Word document, thinking hard about what Harlan Ellison meant to me, how he inspired me as a writer and a person, and how best to remember him when that terrible day came when he left us. But I'd get no more than a page in and my heart would leave me and what words I could manage rang hollow and weak. Then I would slowly delete what I had written, watching my cursor backwards-gobble every painfully extracted word until the document was as blank as the hour I'd started. I trashed every version, I saved no drafts. Call it superstition or wishful thinking or some atavistic fear of tempting old gods, but I simply could not bring myself to write a death notice for a man who was still alive. Thinking on it later only made me infuriated with myself. Why was I hellbent on eulogizing a man who still walked among us?  So I'd be 'ready' for the awful day, as if such a thing were possible? Dash off my pre-fabbed remembrance and be at the cigar lounge in time for Jeopardy!? Maybe the piece would improve with time and a periodic turning like fine Bordeaux; I could revisit it every six months or so for a quick polish (after checking, of course, to make sure the old geezer was still kickin'). What the hell was I getting at, acting like Ellison was dead when he was clearly very not dead?? What endgame, this slavish exercise in contingencies and timeliness? None. None! And I knew it. I was being a compulsive ninny, a tire-kicking boob desperate to write something else, anything else, as long as it wasn't yet another draft of my novel's prologue. But Ellison's obituary? No, I would not – I could not – do such a thing. I would cease to dwell on the future and remain, as I had every day for the last thirty-six years, in a world where Harlan Ellison was still alive.

Harlan Jay Ellison died on June 28h, 2018. He went to sleep beside his wife Susan in his home in Los Angeles and never woke up. He was eighty-four years old. He survived coronary bypass surgery in the late nineties, a stroke in 2007, and a crippling bout of depression in the first half of this decade. In his last interactions with the public some ten years ago he was as spry, as ornery, as irascible as ever – snow-haired, pale, and cavernously wrinkled, bent a bit at the waist and about as slow as you'd expect an octogenarian to be, but...still Harlan. Always Harlan to the end. Now the terrible day has come and gone. Now I can finally write that piece I tried so many times to write. And now I understand why those old pieces died in the womb, all tin-eared, and pointless: because I had written them in a world where Harlan Ellison was alive, before the universe became the smaller, colder, less interesting place it is now that he is gone...before his departure broke my heart in two and left me nothing but words – his, artifacts of bygone brilliance, and mine, clunky and inadequate, squeezed out in a vain attempt to staunch the wound left in his absence. Words were always enough for Harlan. For me they seem woefully inadequate. But I'm in front of the computer, which for Harlan was always nine-tenths of the battle: get your butt in the chair and do the work. So for him, I will.

So...Harlan and me.

My first experience was in grade school. My library had a still-picture paperback of the Star Trek episode 'City on the Edge of Forever' – literally a collection of glossy screenshots taken directly from the episode, arrayed in sequence with dialogue boxes superimposed over the pictures like a live-action comic book. I was a budding nerd and my library had precious little in the way of sci-fi, so that smudged and crinkled little volume was my constant companion between lunch and dreaded gym class. I didn't know at the time I was reading Harlan Ellison's work, wouldn't know until many years later he was the author of the most universally acclaimed Star Trek episode of all time. It would be years more before I would learn the full story behind that episode, how Ellison's original version was much darker and subject to heavy censor by the studio. In my twenties I had the joy of reading the unaltered script, when I could actually appreciate the brilliance of the initial vision and the frustration he felt at having his work be so criminally defanged by skittish executives. At the time I only knew that torn and greasy paperback seemed pretty damn cool (and gee, it had to be the only episode of original Trek where McCoy went bonkers from a drug overdose, right?!). It was the first of countless times Ellison's imagination would succor me.

I could not say when it was that I read my first Ellison short story, but I do recall when I began pursuing his stories because they were his. See, I'd heard his name bandied about by the comic book and sci-fi communities, often spoken with a mixture of hushed reverence and a kind of bloviating envy/scorn by other writers who knew him by reputation. I knew him to be one of the giants of speculative fiction's “between” period (as Neil Gaiman refers to it), after the golden age of legends like Asimov and Bester but before the so-called “modern” age that gave us William Gibson, Gaiman, a slew of others. I told myself I'd try him one day, but I was too into my Star Wars novels and my first tentative steps into High Fantasy to think much on it. Then my cousin began lending me a steady supply of VHS tapes full of Babylon 5. And there in the credits, week after week, was 'Conceptual Consultant: Harlan Ellison'. That tented an eyebrow. Him again. Here was a guy without a hard science background (hell, without a college degree!) consulting on a space-drama that prided itself on realism, the anti-Star Trek, there simply to serve as a narrative oracle advising on matters of plot, pacing, character, and arc. I would later learn that creator J. Michael Straczynski, himself no slouch in the plotting department, deferred to him regularly during his unprecedented (and still unmatched) marathon penning of nearly 100 episodes of his series. He wanted wisdom from the best; in Ellison he got the best of the best. Babylon 5 remains the greatest long-form science fiction TV show ever created, and Straczynski would tell you in a heartbeat (or a tweet) that Ellison had a great deal to do with it (even if the crew found him to be a prickly, excitable bastard most of the time). That “him again” moment is what tipped the scales for me. I knew I loved Babylon 5, so it jolly well stood to reason the sage whispering sweet story advice into JMS's ears would be worth a real read. I pursued Ellison from there on, and I was never the same.

Over the years I seasoned my other reading with collections of Ellison stories. I devoured Over the Edge, Angry Candy, and Slippage, each of which contained one or two of his 'classic' works, including “Repent, Harlequin Said The Ticktock Man”, “I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream”, and “Demon With a Glass Hand”. A friend lent me the long-shuddered original I, Robot screenplay, penned by Ellison in the late '70s, shelved by the studio, and never produced (the Will Smith abomination released years later was a different, infinitely inferior, animal). That was my first foray into Ellison the scene-designer. As a short story writer he was brazen and aggressive, the literary equivalent of a clump of dirt in your eyes followed by a shot to the crotch. Imagine my surprise, then, when Ellison the screenplay writer proved a meticulous fuss-budget, describing his scenes in exacting, almost painful detail, including beat counts, pan angles, lens effects, and even lighting suggestions. I, Robot was deemed un-filmable at the time in part because Ellison's descriptions called for effects that would have been impossible at the time, both a testament to his imagination and his gave-no-shits attitude toward the storytelling limits of cinema in the pre-CGI era. It was also the impetus for one of Ellison's most famous dust-ups with a studio executive: upon realizing the stuffed shirt slated to produce the picture had never read the screenplay, Ellison reportedly dove across the table and throttled the man, telling him he “had the intellectual and cranial capacity of an artichoke.” Alas, studios high on Star Wars' success wanted their sci-fi to have 'cute' robots and swashbuckling, of which Ellison's piece had not a wit. It was, however, a masterpiece of science fiction, a layered, profound, deeply moving rumination on the nature of consciousness, humanity's place in the distant future, and Asimov's sacred Three Rules of Robotics.

Ellison's short fiction was a revelation. He was as articulate, as careful, and as brilliant with his words as any of the greats of the medium, but he narrated with such a a singular energy, such punchy, cocksure drive and poise regardless of subject matter. Every clause was a one-two attack, every sentence a parry-riposte of crackling linguistic know-how. Here was a man who wrote as much for love of the words themselves as the stories the words told, and wrote them without pretense or any sense of having grasped for it. I always imagined he rarely if ever used a thesaurus (though I'm sure he probably did), because his modus operandi was to spin adjectives out of slang and artful, off-kilter sayings, hyphening compound nonsense terms together into gorgeous descriptors that said things in ways that said it all but in a way you were never likely to hear again. Yet he did it while weaving together some of the most inspired speculative concepts ever conceived. Look at the Hugo-nominated “The Man Who Rowed Christopher Columbus Ashore”, told as a series of daily log entries in the life of a divine being who cavorts through time and space performing acts of mischief and compassion in equal measure (including the titular rowing act, and a heartwarming interlude in which he saves a young prostitute in the 1880s by tasering a man with a stun gun). In that, and so many others, Ellison showed me the power of voice, that elusive quality of a narrator who speaks with a life and a character all his – or her – own, engaging the reader through sheer force of personality. One did not have to be a constipated word-slave to write well; the layout of the words, the delivery method of storytelling was every bit as important as the story itself. Every story, regardless of topic, read like an Ellison story, and every narrator was a shade of the man himself. He wrote with a deliberate insistence, a haughty, prideful imposition that forced you into uncomfortable corners, tripped you up, challenged you, and goaded you to keep going.

I met Harlan in the fall of 2000. It was New York City at the Fifth Avenue Barnes and Noble, and the man was on hand to sign the newly-released and expanded edition of the seminal sci-fi anthology Dangerous Visions, of which he had been the longtime editor. I was a sophomore at Marist College and could hardly think of a better use of a dull Saturday and my meager funds than to grab a train south to meet the man who had become my writing idol (Metro North, of course – no Amtrak for me; I wasn't made of money!). I remember it was a cold, wet, lousy day in the city. The steel-lined streets acted like wind tunnels, compressing the bitter air into a semisolid freight train that cut through my layers and smattered my glasses with grungy city-spray. And B&N, in their infinite wisdom, decided to queue us up outside. It wasn't bad. In fact, it was joyous – every single person, more than a hundred in total, was there for the same reason, after all. We passed the time merrily, talking all things Harlan with complete strangers. Passersby on the street stopped to ask us who we were waiting for, perhaps wondering if it was a celebrity of sorts, someone famous. When we said “Harlan Ellison!” most people simply crooked an eyebrow, muttered a terse “Oh” and moved on. We didn't care. We loved it. They would never understand. And Harlan wasn't here for them. He was here for us.

Harlan arrived, and I was instantly struck by how unbelievably ordinary he looked. Just a white-haired old man in a plain, fire-engine red sweatshirt, all five feet and five inches of him, cutting a swath through the PR folks and the handlers like a literary alpha dog. God, how my heart jumped! When he saw that his adoring public had been corralled outside he pitched a fit, berating the staff for leaving his fans out in the cold. Then he gave the crowd the thrill of their lives by walking out of the building and down the entire line, first person to the last, all the while lambasting the staff for a pack of whoreson miscreants for abusing his readers like that. The star-dazzle that had briefly left us all mute dissipated quickly as we all began to hoot with laughter. Hey, it had only been ten seconds, but here already was Harlan being Harlan, exactly what we expected and still more than we could have ever hoped for. Already it was the best signing ever.

I can't remember the entirety of what I said to him. It was probably something stupid. I do remember I said “Hello” and something asinine about how great it was to meet him and blah blah. I wasn't there to leave an impression; I knew it was folly to try. But as he signed the book I did have the presence of mind to tell him that I had just finished reading An Edge in My Voice, the collected edition of columns he wrote in the early eighties on a litany of topics from Reaganomics to slasher films. I'll never forget the pause in his pen-stroke when I told him that, how he had to stop and actually think about which one that was. “Oh, yeah,” he said, musing. “Yeah, boy that was a while ago.” I was floored. Here was the man who'd penned one of the most thought-provoking and inspiring selections of non-fiction I'd ever read and he had to try to remember having written them! I told him I loved it. “Well, good!” he said, finishing his signature. My companion took our picture. I was smiling a lot bigger than Harlan, but I think he smiled, too. A little bit. After I shook his hand – warm, firm, dry – I stood back and watched my friend make an appropriate ass of himself. My companion, see, was an Ellison neophyte at the time (he's since done his penance and become a true believer), but he knew of Ellison the Legend and was eager to begin his journey with a bang by meeting the man himself. I cautioned him about not 'saying something stupid', that Ellison was no shrinking violet and would happily seize upon anything he saw as low hanging fruit to skewer him, a perfect stranger, because that was what he did. My friend, predictably, did the opposite. And Ellison obliged.
“I have to say,” my friend began, “I haven't really read you yet, but after today, I'm going to start.”

Ellison responded as only he could. He gaped incredulously at my friend and said, “Well, you lying sack of shit! What the hell do I care if you've never read my stuff?! Think that matters to me?!” Everyone in the room laughed, my companion included. What a treat – not merely to meet the Man but to see a live demonstration of his famous fuck-you disposition on full display! I giggled for twenty blocks, and have thanked Harlan every day for the extra little treat he gave me free of charge. Dangerous Visions, signed by Harlan, remains on my shelf in a place of honor. I don't think I've ever read it – not that edition, anyway.

In recent years I have partaken of The Glass Teat and The Other Glass Teat, the series of columns Ellison wrote in the late '60s-early '70s for the Los Angeles Free Press. I recommend this to anyone even if you have no interest in Nixon-era TV (ostensibly to focus of the columns) for everything else Harlan rapped about during those impossibly turbulent times, including news suppression, censorship, government propaganda, the entertainment industry's slavish kowtowing to middle America (the 'vast plains of scuttlefish', as he called the folks in the fly-over states), endless lies about Vietnam, race conflicts, and the youth movement. Turbulent also was Harlan's own life back then, finding himself at the epicenter of campus demonstrations, student riots, and a proactive campaign by Spiro Agnew to quash his work (in brief, Ellison questioned the size of Agnew's manhood; later the second Teat volume's release was delayed years due to an Agnew-driven intimidation campaign against book sellers and Ellison's distributors). That the then-Vice President of the United States would resort to strong-arming a publisher who had profited mightily selling Harlan's books into reneging on a contract speaks volumes of Ellison's power as a writer, the reach he enjoyed during those heady, bile-filled days, and the weight the printed word carried back then. Ellison, after all, never tweeted a word in his life, had no social media platforms or YouTube channel to puff up his profile. He had 2000 words a week in the L.A. Freep, a suitably quaint soapbox by today's standards. Back then? It was as grand a pulpit as he needed (though surely smaller than he wanted) to speak his mind and piss off a lot of people in the process. Indeed, during his run with Teat Harlan's columns cost him several prominent writing jobs, most of his allies in the industry and more than one friend (his chronicling of the single episode he wrote of The Young Lawyers is a slow-motion train wreck of dashed hopes, missed chances, and a hundred awful pitfalls of writing in Hollywood). Yes, he was a prick to most people who knew him and a bastard prick to those unlucky enough to be counted among his (many) enemies...but everyone read him, dammit, and no one who did put his stuff down who wasn't left feeling engaged, motivated, angry, and, yes, inspired.

Ellison wrote with a courage I don't have, and may never acquire. He mocked the rules of the trade by inventing his own and showing up his contemporaries on a regular basis. He gave exactly zero shits, tackling the hardest of contemporary issues while simultaneously launching himself at the most whimsical of dalliances and turning them into astounding, thrilling, life-affirming stories. His mind was an overclocked idea factory, ceaselessly creating, musing, speculating. I loved that about him because I want more than anything to be like that, and I fear with each passing day that I'm losing that magic he managed to cling to his entire life. I watch old interviews with him, I read his words, I see the brains and the fury in equal measure, the mischief he made and the honestly with which he presented it all and I just stand in awe. How...how did he stay so damn good for so long? He was brash but he was true, he was smart but he was grounded, angry but hopeful, all armor and thorns on the outside but (and this is true) mush on the inside, the classic shattered idealist-turned-reluctant cynic. I flatter myself when I say I saw much of myself in him; perhaps only the palest of shades, a glimpse of what I could be if only I had the guts, the grit, the sheer cajones he had when he put his butt in front of that typewriter every SINGLE FREAKIN' DAY. As a man he was far from perfect. But as a writer he was, and will remain, my Ideal.

For more than a decade now I have pecked away at The Essential Ellison, the 50-year retrospective mega-anthology that is a marvelous cross-section – though still only a sampling – of Ellison's entire career. To date I still have, I think, just three or four more pieces to read until I am finished. I know I held off reading those last pieces as part of the same superstitious ritual that kept me from writing this reminiscence. The thought of completing that mighty tome just had such an air of finality to it, like I'd seen the best and all the would left for me was...the rest (though with 1700 stories and non-fiction pieces to his name, I doubt I shall ever truly finish 'the rest'). Yes, my reticence stemmed from a reluctance to let go, an unwillingness to accept that Harlan Ellison could ever 'end'. Vainly, childishly, I suppose I felt that if there was at least something left I hadn't read, he'd simply have to keep on living, keep writing, keep being Harlan...hopefully forever.

I learned of his passing at work. I checked the Ellison Facebook page and there on the banner was the simple announcement. I silently thanked the Universe that I had decided to stay late that night, then I leaned forward in my chair and, with an utter absence of pretense or shame, put my head gently down on my desk and cried for ten minutes, letting the sadness and shock and the guilt of feeling relief – yes, relief – wash over me in slowly diminishing waves, tears flowing freely, my heart in a vise but, weirdly, a smile on my face, too. Here now was that thing I'd been dreading for so long, but...Jesus, some part of it actually felt good. I wrestled for a long time with how that could be. I think it was because I was finally able to admit that Harlan had done everything he was ever going to do on this Earth and by dammit, he had earned his rest. No amount of wishing or ritual or superstition was going to keep him here...and that was okay. He gave us an entire universe. We could ask no more of him, and it was fitting that he should leave before he overstayed his welcome. Acknowledging that, and the onrush of unfiltered feelings that came immediately after – sorrow, joy, gratitude, finality, mortality – amidst the boring beige walls of my office at the end of a dull week was like being knocked down by a cold wave while wading in shallows: surprising and unnerving for a moment, but invigorating, too.

Harlan is gone now, a reality that I'm sure would bemuse and tickle him to no end (once, reflecting on the decline of integrity in America, he said "I tell ya, thank God I'm gonna die soon."). He left behind a lexicon of work few will ever surpass, not in quantity or quality and certainly not in both. He was not the man who inspired me to become a writer. He was the man who inspired me to keep trying, who showed me what a writer could do with just a stab of wit, a love of language, a gut full of bile, and a willingness to do the damn work. I quit a hundred times. I wanted to quit a hundred more. I want to quit still. Then the tome comes out, and for a few minutes or a few hours I read the words and I remember...it is possible. It is still possible. A simple lesson, inelegant and understated, two things he was not. But it was the lesson Harlan Ellison gave me, and I will cherish that forever.

I remember now one last thing I said to him when he passed his signed book back to me and I shook his hand. It wasn't “thank you” as I often recall; it was “thank you for everything”.

And he said to me, “You got it, kid.”

The Author and the author (of this piece) in Autumn, 2000.

Thursday, June 21, 2018

George Carlin: A Ten-Year Reminiscence

Doin' It Again - the one that started it for me
George Carlin was prophet hiding in plain sight. He assumed the guise of an entertainer because, like most soothsayers in their own time, he preached a doctrine that was feared and misunderstood. In classical theater it was not the brave hero, wise matriarch, or revered elder but the Fool, the jester, the harmless comedian who illuminated the audience with moral instruction and disseminated Truth, carefully disguising his lessons behind cantrips and motley and bombastic lingo. Humor made the medicine go down easier, and meditations on the human experience were best swallowed with a merry song and a bit of capering. Or in Carlin's case, some fart jokes.

Carlin, of course, never pretended he wasn't preaching. He would have balked at the word – or any similar one so nearly associated with organized religion – but nightly on stage, in city after city, show after show for over 40 years, that is indeed what he did: he preached. Ethics. Morals. Values. Lies. Theology. Hypocrisy. Baseball versus football. His was a vast palette, a hundred-fold dabs of smudgy rhetorical paint mixed into a acid-tongued slurry of sacred and profane. He left behind not a single canvas but a tapestry of original comedy that changed the way we think, how we talk, and, yes, what we can and can't say on TV.

Carlin made an impression on me from the beginning. I was 11, I think, as bookish then as I am now, already a lover of words and a burgeoning cynic. I'd heard my share of stand-up, mostly from borrowed cassettes or scratchy VHS tapes on loan from relatives. Though I was too young to appreciate Delirious in time for its 1983 debut, when I chanced upon it a handful of years later I reveled in its hedonistic energy and the flood of forbidden profanity booming from Eddie Murphy like mortar rounds of raw sewage. Though my sister and cousins did their teenage best to keep my virgin ears pure (they were in for it, should I deign to repeat anything I heard that night), the damage had been done. Foulness was funny. But it wasn't until I happened upon a bootleg copy of Carlin's Doin' It Again that the other half of the equation became clear: foulness is funny, but alone it was flat, one-note, and ultimately forgettable. But combined with wit, straight talk, and a keen eye for human behavior, foulness could also be brilliant, insightful, and, most importantly, a window into uncomfortable truths. The nascent philosopher in me awoke. Truth wasn't merely foul; it was icky...but even as a pre-teen I knew Truth was real and it felt wrong that it should ever be ignored. By sandwiching it between rants about airline safety announcements and bad drivers, this scowling ex-hippie in the black t-shirt and ponytail presented Truth in a way that simply could NOT be ignored. Here was a man who could split your sides with a joke about laminating your own testicles one minute then ruminate for the next ten about Little Things We All Share, a hilarious bit that highlighted the beautiful sameness of the human experience irrespective of race, gender, or social status. In less than two hours I was a Carlin convert; I have remained so my entire life.

Carlin deepened my appreciation of the English language in ways no style guide or college professor ever could. Words were a hobby of his, and language and its reflections of human foibles a hallmark of his act for decades. Even his most recognizable routine of all time, 'A Place for Your Stuff', deconstructed the trappings of modern life using just one repeated word – “stuff” – as a lever. But for me the game-changer was his inspired bit about euphemisms and dishonest language. Using a slick set of blistering (and frighteningly commonplace) examples, Carlin exposed the weakening of English through the pervasion of soft, cowardly, and conniving words and phrases that manipulate ugly truths and turn them into sugary falsehoods; language that “takes the life out of life.” 'Fired' was now 'management curtailed redundancies in the human resource sector' . 'Homeless people' used to live in 'slums'; now the 'economically disadvantaged occupied sub-standard housing in the inner cities'. Governments used to be called out for lying but now they merely engage in disinformation. Meteorologists loved to talk about shower activity because it sounded more important than showers. And his most potent example by far: shellshock was enervated war after war for a hundred years, first to battle fatigue, then operational exhaustion, and finally post-traumatic stress disorder. People, Carlin knew, were bullshitting themselves into believing that if you changed the name of something you somehow changed the thing itself, and always in a manner that made life less scary but also altogether less true. And it wasn't getting better. He foresaw church shootings before the first recorded one occurred, and posited that the perpetrator would be called a 'disgruntled worshipper'. He knew then, and saw where we were going. In an age when Brian Williams justified blatant lies about his own battlefield experiences by claiming he “mis-remembered” them, the bit rings truer now than ever before. That our current president daily engages in falsehoods that would cow Loki himself makes the case for Carlin as a true seer plainer than I ever could.

As one who writes for a living, not a day passes I don't rail against double-speak and weak, duplicitous vernacular in a manner I hope would make George proud. I don't try to copy him. I'd never presume. But his influence has fundamentally affected the way I approach my job. I face my corporate-speaking colleagues like a rock in a storm, weathering their suit-and-tie lingo with a Carlin-esque smirk, then riposte the way he taught me: by advocating simple, honest, direct language. It has made me a more assertive contributor in meetings and more fearless in my work in general, and I like to think I've carved out a niche all my own as 'that guy', the guy who speaks and writes in a straight line. My co-workers don't know what to make of me half the time, and every sidelong glance or clueless gawp I earn from them makes me think that George is smiling somewhere.

I say “somewhere” because he assuredly did not believe in Heaven, though he used it as a set piece in many, many of his routines, and Hell, too, naturally. He resented the idea that our dead relatives are 'smiling down on us' and answering our prayers (“I'm sorry, but I have to believe we have better things to do after we die than run the Heavenly branch of the Make a Wish Foundation”). Many people cited Carlin as the man who turned them away from organized religion. I tend to think of it more like he managed to put to words many of the thoughts I'd bandied about for years but could never quite articulate, and so gave my angst re: theology a voice. I related to George as the classic 'recovering Catholic', having had The Doctrine drilled into me at a young age (though admittedly nothing close to the severity he experienced in an Irish-American enclave of Manhattan circa 1945) before jettisoning much of it at an older age. Like him, I observed how the history of human bloodletting and savagery seemed indelibly intertwined with the rise of institutionalized faiths and that more people had been murdered in the name of God than for any other cause. It never made sense to me, nor did so many so-called 'Christians' regularly engaging in bigotry and exclusion, to say nothing of their cognitive dissonance pledging themselves to mortal godheads miles removed from anything Christ-like (looking at you, Joel Osteen). The sex abuse stories racking through the news like shark's teeth didn't help, and infinitely, infinitely worse the follow-up stories about Church leaders covering up the crimes. Then came Religion is Bullshit, when I realized my frustrations stemmed largely from an inability or unwillingness – including my own – to talk straight, not about “Bible-thumpers” or pedophiles or born-agains, but about the fundamentally absurd tenets of faith itself. Those things that simply have to be taken on faith, because if you take so much as three minutes to think rationally about it...well, you start laughing. Exactly what Carlin intended.

“Think about it: religion has actually convinced people...that there's an invisible man living in the sky! And He has a list of exactly ten things He does not want you to do! And if you do any of these things, He has a special place full of fire and torment and smoke and torture and suffering that He is going to send you to burn and scream and choke and suffer and cry forever and ever for all eternity until the end of time!
But he loves you! He loves you and he needs money! He's all knowing, all loving, all seeing, and all-powerful but he just can't figure out money! He always seems to need a little more.”

I suppose some of my more arch-Catholic friends would accuse me of letting Carlin needlessly carry a chip on my shoulder, but in the 20+ years since I first heard him put to words those scattered thoughts of mine, I still haven't been able to say it better than he did. George captured that underlying vileness I had always felt around orthodoxy and the terrible unease I felt whenever I found myself in a room where large groups chanted in unison. I suppose it's the same reason I didn't last an hour at my first ever Boy Scouts meeting. Carlin didn't make me a free thinker, but he surely made me realize I wasn't wrong for being that way.

I caught a rerun of It's Bad For Ya on some hotel HBO one night on a week-long excursion to Oregon wine country. I'd seen George here and there in movies and TV appearances since his crotchety golden age of the mid-90s – his brief appearance in Kevin Smith's Dogma as a Catholic cardinal unveiling the grinning 'Buddy Christ' statue was a gut-busting career highlight (“Christ didn't come to Earth to give us the willies!”) and his cameo in Scary Movie 2 savaging the incomprehensible 'Architect' character from The Matrix was also hilarious. But Bad For Ya was the first time Carlin had ever seemed old to me. He'd done some time in rehab, having relapsed into substance abuse after a long period of sobriety. Clean again, he was slow in his movements, eschewing his comfortable cross-stage stride for a slower, more static pose, he used index cards to keep his place, and the hour-plus onstage seemed to tire him. His bits were more curmudgeonly, his japes a bit more cutting...or perhaps it was us who had changed in his absence and we had fallen victim to that softening against which he had railed so powerfully. But oh Lord, the fire in his belly hadn't dimmed in the slightest. His extended polemic about fat Americans remains one of his most viewed routines on YouTube, and many were the points he made that I had pondered myself (on seeing an enormously overweight couple, “Jesus, do these two people fuck? It does not seem structurally possible that those two could achieve penetration. Maybe they're in the Circe du Solei thing.”)

I mourned when Carlin died, quietly thanked the Universe for taking him before he had become completely infirm, and, yes, felt a little guilty for thinking it. He had the rather rare distinction among prophets of living to a ripe age and going out on a high note.  But like those who came before him, his words have lingered and endured and evolved to accrue new meaning in this age, an even more cynical age that has already shifted under our feet so much since he left us. There will never be another like him, and I thank the Universe for sharing him with us for seventy-one years.

“Take care of yourselves, and take care of someone else.”